SYED UMAIR AKHTAR versus LESCO
Article 199 On a charge of maintaining the constitutional petition, the tenant of a shop, was accused of stealing electricity, alleging that it was illegally issued, which had no justification for the Department's request. Challenger Lux Standi challenged him to uphold the application. He was not a user because there was another person on record, the user said that the other person was supported by the notice issued allegations and counter charges, such as energy theft, would require a thorough factual investigation. Constitutional application was dismissed before civil court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Skardu lawyer
