Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAH TAREENA versus STATE

This was in violation of Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 conviction of testimony, reduction of police witnesses, Section 103 of the CRPFCFCFact against the perpetrator / appellant. 12 kg of hashish was recovered from his possession. The trial court sentenced the culprits to life imprisonment and sentenced them. The appellant was an old woman with poor and poor health, and the litigation case was very suspicious. The recovery of intoxicants was made in view of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, which specifically requested the exclusion of section 103 of the Special Law, CC police officers were competent witnesses and their testimony was merely because Could not be ruled out that they were police personnel, and evidence of recovery regarding the export of drug paraphernalia and the sending of it for chemical analysis was established by the prosecution's witnesses, which respected the Chemical Examiner's report as positive. According to the amount of, the accused reduced the sentence of life imprisonment for a woman, former non-criminal and first offender. Was made twelve years in the App r \ n \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Pishin lawyer