Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD GULZAR versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/SPECIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST CLASS, MULTAN

Sections 3, 6, 7 and Schedule Item (vii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Required commodity fruit applicants were the fruit retailer and the authorities prevented the sale of profit and storage under section 7 of 1977 Was fined. The ploy taken by the applicants was that the fruits were not declared as essential commodities. The fruit was included in the Schedule to Price Control and Prevention Profit and Prevention Act, item number (vii) of the 1977 Act, which did not make the fruit mandatory, officials said. Anywhere in the entire Schedule to the Cost Control and Profit and Stock Prevention Act 1977, the commodity exchange, the Price Control and Profit and Stock Act, 1977 was stated in Schedule to Item No. (vii). , Water and Squash, which was a different class of goods contained in the control of special pricing and the prevention of profit and profit In the Ding Act, 1977, the articles which were declared as a mandatory item Fruits were not needed, authorities had no legal authority to impose fines and recover the applicants, as they He therefore did not violate any such order. The order was not available Applicants were fined and the recovery of fines was declared invalid and without any legal authority and the High Court directed the authorities to return the fines to the applicants. according to r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Kallat lawyer