Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND OTHERS versus STATE

Article 302/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examine the evidence Double murder committed by the aggressing party Plan Convicted of killing two real brothers on a piece of land dispute and sentenced to death Court Maintained by the High Court, the court alleged that they were not assailants, but rather it was the complaining party that was the attacker, one of the accused was killed by the spear of the accused, Until the attacker could attack, the victim was near the point where the victim's death was located in the middle of the house, which meant he had to Pune indoors suspect was killed. The other victim, who was also inside the house, from where he headed towards the former Late. To help her, other suspects opened fire on the spot, which was the center of a nearby residential residence. One person couldn't have two opinions. As to who could be the attacker in such circumstances, the prosecutor prosecuted the case through ocular testimony, which the defendant supported, along with the post-mortem reports, the recovery of the accused, the civil court's resort or Instead of initiating proceedings under Section 1545 PC, the law was taken into its own. Hands and two murders occurred because the deceased party had opened the controversial circumstantial evidence in its own wall and was once praised by two other courts, which led to the Supreme Court approaching it. There were no plausible reasons for disagreement, nor were there any critical circumstances available. The appeal of the two brothers was cordially denied. property advocate from Vehari lawyer