Find a Lawyer

BAKHSHAN versus STATE

The allegations were affirmed in their statement filed under Sections 302 (b), 324, 353 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a) section 342, the PC acknowledged the whole case of prosecution, Except that his involvement implies that the perpetrators had kidnapped him, but he did not participate in the commission of the accused's statement, he made it clear that he was the person who was the car at the time of the incident. Was driving, all the prosecution witnesses dismissed the person who was driving. The suspect opened fire with his pistol, in which case, the person may have been driving at the time of the incident and fired at the deceased, as the statement of the prosecution witnesses was not challenged on this aspect of the case. ? Defense counsel denied any question that the accused was not driving or the victim was not fired, the accused was appointed as the person who fired on the subordinate against the trial order. The accused was convicted and sentenced, dismissed power of attorney advocate FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer