ABDUL RAQEEB versus 1ST RENT CONTROLLER/1ST SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SUKKUR
Under Section 10 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition, the Applicable Principle, the Applicants challenged the order passed by the Controller of Rent, thereby preventing further processing of the eviction petition. Was given The Controller of the High Court did not discuss the grounds on which the proceedings were stayed, on the basis that the action was halted, not directly and essentially the same section 10, CPC Provided for the prosecution in a later established case. In the presence of the preceding suit, the disclosure request could not be placed on the power of the pending suit, which was a premature withdrawal request and thereafter a civil review was made which followed the application of section 10, CPC when two The suits were pending and the case was the same in both suits. Following the establishment of proceedings in the subsequent case, the judgment will serve as a race judista on the basis of section 11, CPC, as imposed in the preceding ins.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
