Find a Lawyer

SARDAR SHER MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Explosives Act (III of 1884), Sections 3 and 4 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d), both for bail, recovery and arrest. Was associated with a grant of The accused's older brother, both said that the brothers were envious of each other as there was a dispute between them over the possession of certain land. Such a situation raised doubts about the whole story of arrest and recovery. As the prosecution has told the authenticity of the prosecution's case. Further threats were made in view of the fact that although the number of weapons recovered was not, the only weapon identified by the warlord, Sher Mohammad Rand Syed, was the only identifier of the weapon, but experts did not report. Weapons have been inspected. It was not known whether the weapon sent to the weapons expert allegedly recovered the weapon, though it was completely destroyed. About 20 to 20 days of recovery, but the ballistic expert was not sent to confirm whether he was in fact a hand grenade and whether he was a minister or not, it was difficult to believe that the police party had two Section H Oo and his crew, the FIR allowed no proper description of the car, neither its make-up nor its disclosure, the accused was admitted on bail, under the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Phagwar lawyer