Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMED versus TAHIR MAHMOOD

Section 497 (5) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 18 bail, refusal to cancel two months and ten days delay in filing FIR, clearly to applicants / complainants However, it was never after filing an FIR that the accused accused of joining the investigation had never made a statement to the Investigation Agency in which the applicant / complainant in connection with the present case. Various police officers have been presenting contradictory versions on various stages, even before the instance of the accused party A criminal case was registered. The filing of an FIR by the complainant against the accused in the present case welcomes the lawyer for the defendant / accused in his malicious involvement, as in the previous case, this fact is true and some of the accused's possession. Also could not be exported and there was no difference. Investigation into the matter was included while the challan was already being presented before the court. The bail was granted nine months before the arrest for the third culprit of the investigation and any wrongdoing by it. There was no allegation of misuse of the use or bail exception and the trial was held under a completely different jurisdiction to consider and cancel the bail. The court cannot interfere with the bail of the respondent / accused patent advocate from Khanpur lawyer