Find a Lawyer

DR. JAVAID AKHTAR versus STATE

Section 17 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Laws in Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 203 F (2B) Constitutional Jurisdiction Identifying the diagnosed evidence, the parade administration of justice accused was sentenced under Section 392, PPC and sentenced to 8 years imprisonment, which instead of seeking leave under Article 203 F (2B) of the Constitution, the accused, in Article 185 (Filed under),)) The constitution's accused confessed that the complainant did not identify him during the identification parade, the identity parade was not a legal requirement if the defendant testified before the trial court. Identify which was sufficient to punish the identity parade was unnecessary if the accused was identified. A literate woman proved by other solid evidence was not forgiven the real culprits and did not designate the innocent person at the request of the police, both of which were properly appreciated by the evidence on the record relating to the crime of the accused under Article 185 (3). Subsequently, the following two courts reached a conclusion. Of the constitution, list of advocates from Khuiratta lawyer