Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus DHANI BUX

Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 suit were adopted on the basis of an earlier order based on alleged fraud and misrepresentation. Which was approved. In favor of this, the defendants, in his name, sought to convert the disputed land, claiming that he was the original owner of 112 acres of the 211-acre disputed land, by filing an application under section 12 (2). , The CPC demanded that the former party decree be set aside. The plaintiff's claim that he had purchased a 112-acre property from the person to whom the land was transferred under the defendants' lawsuit in the AQQ law alleges that the plaintiff was a party to the trial. Receives judgment and injunction behind their backs without applying them as status. The court allowed the defendants' petition filed under section 12 (2), CPC, and set aside the former party decree, but the appellate court below reversed an order passed by the trial court. Defendants filed a constitutional petition against the previous judgment and the decree decision, below the approved position, the appellate court said, at the time of the ex-parte decree, 112 acres of disputed land stood in the name of the plaintiff. The federal government was the owner of the land, the unclean decision was put aside, and the trial court's order on defendants' requests filed under section 12 (2), CPC, was reinstated, with further instructions. That the Plaintiff will file an amended Claimant, acting on the Defendants. , Etc. \ r \ n \ r \ n advocate from Alipur lawyer