Section 302 Definition of Evidence The benefit of doubt is that the complainant does not endorse the material mentioned in the FIR or that the evidence of the complainant from the statements of the prosecutor's witness withheld from the statement made in the FIR, The prosecutor did not declare the complainant. It will be deemed that the prosecution has accepted their evidence as it was given in court which was on oath, the prosecution's witness did not assign the accused to the defendant for injury, according to the prosecution. The testimony of the other prosecution was not examined Prosecution of the witness of the prosecution has not been examined on the basis that it was stated that he was not supporting the prosecution's testimony The prosecutor needed to have his witness examined and After declaring it objectionable, he can be examined so that his statement can reveal the true picture. , But whether the prosecutor called the piece of evidence and did not allow the trial court to review and examine the evidence in its true context, the prosecutor failed to prove the defendant beyond any reasonable doubt, The benefit of the doubt was given
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
