Find a Lawyer

AZIZULLAH MEMON versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Sections 3 and 11 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), sentencing sensation, enforcement of the whole proceeding, commencement of the issuance of charge sheet, inquiry of the department, order to impose fines, change of fines by authorized officer and final Before the order tribunal was disallowed, then the Sindh Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules were enforced under the provisions of the 1973 Act when the Service (Special Powers) Sindh Ordinance 2000 was already in service (Special Powers) Sindh Ordinance 2000. The removal was announced. It had a greater effect on all other laws, but neither the officials of the Department nor the Service Tribunal bothered to notice that after the date of the issuance of the Ordinance, all deliberative proceedings, rather than rules, were enacted in 1973. Should have started under the ordinance. Under the misunderstanding of the law and any wrong law, it was brought to a logical end, and it affected malicious repetition, including the final order, which could not be sustained under the law as well as the final order. In addition to changing the Court of Appeals and proceedings, the impugned order of the Service Tribunal will be rejected. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gujar Khan lawyer