I.T.A. NO. 5156/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 6TH JUNE, 2006. versus I.T.A. NO. 5156/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 6TH JUNE, 2006.
Sections 114 (6), 122 (3) (B) and 239 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance (1979), revised Return Assessment asserted in the assessment year 2001, 2002, return of income tax return That the assessing officer illegally filed a revised return under section 114 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which was to be a revised order under section 122 (3) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 In 2001, the Accreditation Income Tax Ordinance was enacted in 2001. 7, 2002 and under section 239 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, the 2001 taxation officer did not rightly accept this amended return, as the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 required to accept the sale. ? Was reduced by the appellate tribunal and the GP rate was applied @ 25% @ 20% was instructed to take into account parallel issues.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Warburton lawyer
