NAJEEBULLAH KHAN versus STATE
Article 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for the absence of their senior counsel and proceeding with the accused in the nomination order referred to in the nomination order, the verification of evidence, the conduct of the trial and the trial court. Does not allow. Appointing a defense lawyer at the expense of the state, the matter showed rush and reluctance to move forward on the matter, but it certainly did in criminal matters, especially in the case where the case was dealt. , Did not express or suggest prejudice or bias in the matter. Facing a murder charge, it was suggested that the suspension be granted on the basis of the absence of a senior lawyer, unless it appears to be merely trying to prolong the proceedings of the accused. , Who was capable of involving a lawyer of his choice, would like to have his case run by him and would not agree to allow a lawyer appointed at the expense of the state to prosecute his case. E-appeal was dealt with accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Shorkot lawyer