Find a Lawyer

SYED NUSRAT JAMAL versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB POLICE, COMPLEX, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS

Arts 7 (3), Provisions 185 (a) and 112 Recruitment of Punjab Government Employees (Relaxation in the upper age limit) Rules, 1976, Rr 1 (b), 3 (v) Police Rules, 1934, Preacher Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 199 La Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the development of Assistant Sub Inspector as Section 3 Graduate Constables and Head Constables was to be submitted to the last standing order of the Inspector General of Police, contrary to the prescribed rule of upper age limit. Which could not be corrected to the upper age. The limited standing order was neither approved by the provincial government nor reported to the state Gazette effect petitioners / appellants. Set the 33-year limit for such graduate constables on filling the posts of Assistant Sub-Inspector from the prescribed upper age, the applicants filed a constitutional petition stating that the order established under Article 7 (3) of the Police Order 2002 And advertisement rule 3 (v) of the Rules for Recruitment of Punjab Civil Servants (relaxation of upper age limit) Depending on the fact, the upper age limit was not issued for the Graduate Constables and Head Constables to be included as Assistant Sub Inspectors High Court (Single Judge). In 1976, the upper age limit has been set to 35 years for promotion of the service constables / head constables to the position of Assistant Sub Inspector, applicants have filed an intra-court appeal against the search of a bench in which the police This is the second part of section 7 (3). The Order, 2002, did not recommend any upper age limit for development in the Service Graduate Constables and Head Constables, therefore, the five best law firms from Jaranwala lawyer