Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD ASGHAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 Guarantees, Demand for death due to delay in delivery of arms in a crime related to chronic hemorrhage The accused / applicant was, without prejudice. However, he, along with the co-accused, injured the complainant / subpoena with the weapon which was recorded on the day of the incident by the sub-inspector at the hospital. The trial court dismissed the accused's bail application. The accused has said that there is no evidence of prosecution against him because the prosecution of the two witnesses against him in Kalandra has been dropped by the prosecution. The doctor did not say whether the cause of death was a late-onset injury at the hands of the accused or co-accused. Vacancies recovered from the incident were delayed and sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory and evidence of recovery was not sufficient to convict the accused as no general evidence was available on file. The accused's name was listed in the FIR and a specific role was assigned to it. The late death was caused by a secondary hemorrhage which has caused him suffering and there is no evidence that the attack was not the result of a secondary hemorrhage injury to the victim. Was registered in the FIR shortly after. Incident at a time when the deceased's death was anticipated, therefore, similarly the death declaration FIR, the deceased / complainant's death statement, recovery of arms and crime, medical evidence and the statement of the investigating officer from the commission. Enough to add. The crime is that of a pistol patent advocate from Madinah lawyer