Find a Lawyer

DILMEER versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337 A (i), (ii), 337 F (i) 337 L (ii), 148 and 149 bail, grant of further investigative role to the accused persons. The designated Medico legal certificate question was not supported by which party was the attacker, which will be decided by the trial court after the recording of the evidence if further investigation into the matter, as to the issue of the accused's rights. But will be entitled to bail. And when faced with the question of rights, the latter should attribute the former character to the co-accused, the medico legal certificate was not upheld, and according to the complainant, it did not hurt the victim. And had no effect on recovery. The co-accused was the nightmare and the first trap, the prosecution was thrown mostly through the prosecution case, the co-accused needed further investigation and the question of his involvement was open to doubt, the co-accused was accused of fraud. HT was entitled to bail as a matter of fact, even on the rule of consistency, it was entitled to bail because its role was equal to that of the accompanying accused, who was granted bail. law firms from Tharo Shah lawyer