Find a Lawyer

SHEHZAD KARIM versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION LOHARI GATE, LAHORE

Sections 561A and 265 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 123A, 124A, 147, 148 and 188 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance (XXXI of 1960), Section 16 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) , Section 7 and 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR dispute questions of constitutional application Jurisdiction of the facts under the High Court scope petitioner / accused constitution petition against sections 123A, 124A, 147, 148 and 188 Bail is sought under the lawsuit. Applicants of PPC, Section 16, West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960 and Section 7 Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. That the FIR filed against him was false and serious. Under Section 124A, PPC, this offense was an unreasonable offense that could not be investigated without the prior permission of the magistrate and under Section 7 Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and Section 16, the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order. Were not attracted to the crimes committed under the Ordinance 1960. The applicant was named in the FIR on the accuracy of the applicant and serious allegations were made against him which he denied. Therefore, the dispute is primarily related to the disputed questions of fact which should not have been decided by the High Court to have the High Court convened within its constitutional jurisdiction. Controversial questions were not meant by the court to resolve disputed questions. The applicant had already filed two petitions before the trial court, one of them under section 6565 Cr, CCPC and the other under Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, before the case moved to regular court. To do that power of attorney advocate Sara e Naurang lawyer