Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATE

Sections 7 497, 8 498 and 3 513 bail, granting the grant of guarantee, ope13 and, in the case of CCP Scope and the Court of Session of the Court, while approving the post-arrest warrant for the accused, he Directed to execute guarantees on bank guarantee, did not comply with the provisions of section 497, pre-conditions of CCPC section 497, CCP does not require such condition The CCP, in order to submit the provisions of cash security and section 498, demanded from the court that bail was not a guaranteed amount. When dealing with an application under the High Court Sections 497 and 498, the CRPC is not guaranteed to insist on securing cash security with Sections 497, 498 and 499, CRPC, If read together, the execution of the bond with guarantees will be considered and a Section 513, CRPC did not require cash deposit or a bank guarantee, however, the amount of the guarantee in place of the guaranteed bond As mentioned in the deposit but careful examination of the security tion513, the CR PC concluded that the provisions of this section were for the convenience of the accused. If they were prior to the arrest or had been granted bail after his arrest, section 513, CR PC filed a clause providing that if the police request, the court may allow him to submit. In exchange for the execution of such bonds, the court may determine the amount of money or the government's promise note, it appears that Section 513 was imposed in the interest of the accused, who may be a stranger in the area where the case was registered. Or where he couldn't manage. Bonds of guarantee advocate from Babri Banda lawyer