Find a Lawyer

KHAIR MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Sections 302 and 324 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of the evidence not to record a fresh trial The witnesses were charged with automatic weapons and the special court established the terrorist activity under the law. Punished for the double murder of the Laws, 1995. The automatic TT pistol recorded by the special court was set aside by the High Court and the case was sent to a session judge for trial without recording any evidence. In the post-remand case, the accused were again sentenced. He was sentenced to death and the trial court sentenced him. It was upheld by the High Court, who raised by the accused that the evidence relied on by the trial court was not recorded by the competent court and that the testimony of the prosecution was related to the complainant. As a result of the High Court decision, fresh evidence was not required to be filed. The accused in the remand trial had accepted the remand order in full, did not add any before, the Additional Sessions Judge was on any objection to the admission of the evidence recorded by the special court's presiding officer of the special court. , Who, after meeting all the conditions of the law, provided the accused with a full opportunity to examine the witnesses, has been accused of failing to identify any legal malpractice. The recording of evidence by a special court, the courts that caused them to create any prejudice on the merits or the final result, the courts established under the Terrorist Activities Act, 1975, were automatic and when you need a advocate from Taxila lawyer