Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS versus TAHIR LATIF

Absent minor inquiries from Rr 3 (d) and 5 duty, the non-holding of a public servant was chosen for a two year course abroad. Because of this, the government employee sought ex-Pakistan leave, which was approved by the government employee, because of further extension of the leave that the course was not completed, the authorities refused to extend the job for another six months. After issuing a job notice, the duty was treated as absentee. Fines against government employees and penalties for withholding increments for one year were imposed, the sentence imposed by the authorities was upheld by the service tribunal, without formal inquiry by the authorities against the civil servant. The decree was approved. If placed in another location, it would be clear that the matter could not be decided without formal inquiry contested by the tentative authority without regular inquiry under R5 of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973. The order to speak against the public servant was not approved, the authorities did not take such action in accordance with the law prescribed in clause (d) of the Supreme Court. ) Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules was an independent provision of R3 of 1973, which was itself a rule that must be processed under R3 (d) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973. It has the prerequisites, which means it must exist, so it would also be necessary to keep the employment of a civil servant on such account was prejudicial to national security, submitting a leave extension request to the authorized authority. After, he was in his stay jobs for fresh advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer