Find a Lawyer

QAMAR MUKHTIAR KHAN versus STATE

Articles 7 497, 43 498, 5 435, 9 A9, 3 493, 3 appreci3 and 1 561 pre-arrest bail, evidence of deep appreciation of evidence, trial of alibi-proof procedure, witness with the role of public prosecutor Seeking, the accused sought pre-arrest request on Alibi's request, as he was under treatment of two doctors, the accused tried to summon both doctors during the hearing of the plea, the trial court appealed with the consent of the parties. But the order was later withdrawn because one of the two doctors was a prosecution witness, who decided to apply for bail. Exchanges should not be demanded on such a scale so as to convince themselves of the accuracy of the documents produced by the accused, in the case of the trial court, if the case was stable, then the trial court should seek relevant records. Could do He went ahead and went to inspect a doctor, who is said to have treated the accused, did not stop there improperly but Dr. W. Ho was offered cross-examination from both sides, the trial. Such an exercise by the court was far more than a temporary review of the evidence and was beyond consideration of section 497 CCPC. Throughout the proceedings, the prosecutor's role appeared to be diminished and it was clearly visible to the public. The prosecutor was made invisible, under section 493, that the CCP should have been summoned and appealed to all courts of law, provided that if Private person or a lawyer will still run public prosecutor is directed to litigation in a court of his own and privately property advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer