Find a Lawyer

MURAD ALI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reversing the Evidence of Judicial Confession Human behavior suspect surrendered to the police about eleven days after the incident and the magistrate accused voluntarily before the judicial confession. The court confessed to the crime but the trial court found him guilty. The accused and he was sentenced to life imprisonment and the sentence passed by the trial court was upheld by the High Court, the accused confessing that since the confession was recorded with delay of few days, it was voluntary in nature. There was no hard and fast line. Depending on a person's set time, behavior, and then a variety of factors, mental ability and ability can be developed, predicted or carefully calculated, which can be done periodically, It varies and varies from person to person and varies. So, of course, no one can certainly draw any conclusions, nor can anyone evaluate the behavior of a person before, nor can a definitive explanation be made in this regard and it is not safely considered. It may be that since the accused had surrendered to the police station and had also prepared a pistol with live rounds, admitting the killing of the victim, the accused would not be encouraged to volunteer. The confession of his guilt before the Judicial Magistrate on the same day or the next day was not justified in view of the evidence that when the accused was offered to confess his guilt, he was presented before the Judicial Magistrate, Who caused it and needed it famous supreme court advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer