Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR versus STATE

Article 365 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reverses the Evidence for Kidnapping for Abduction. The accused / applicant along with the three accomplices allegedly kidnapped the victim and took them to the forest from where they asked the victim's son in writing. Upon receiving the ransom, the accused released the kidnapper 11 days later, the kidnapper and the prosecution witness identified the accused in the identification test. The accused / applicant and another co-accused were sentenced to life imprisonment and sentenced to life imprisonment and fines. On the property appeal, the High Court acquitted the accused / applicant in the trial and acquitted the accused, the plaintiff in that case, saying that he was abducted by the accused / applicant along with others. What was or was abducted. In the ransom money evidence, the kidnapper brought his son on the chit record written as an example of the accused and was shown abd. CTI statement by the complainant and other prosecution witnesses The Commission confirmed, both on the occasion of the abduction and on the demand for ransom money, that the components of Section 365A, PPC were attracted to the case against the accused for leave. Appeal dismissed \ r \ n inheritance advocates near Farooqabad lawyer