Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, SHEIKHUPURA

Section 13 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (V8 of 1908), Sections 551 and 151, AXXI, R 29 Convention E Martyrs (10 of 1984), Professional Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 491 Suite Rehabilitation Allowance Scope Habitat Corpus Petition Maintainability Plaintiff / Defendant Filed for Restoration Allowance against Defendant / Applicant From Proceedings of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, For Proceedings On which the Family Court ruled and the appeal against it was reduced and dismissed. The appellant court then filed the execution before the court and the defendant filed an objection request which was dismissed by the court and a warrant warrant arrest was issued against the defendant. I was released from judicial lockup for the award of a sum of money, file an application under Order XXI, read with Section 151, CPC for the establishment of proceedings under Rule 29, which the court rejected and He was remanded to a judicial lockup, the plaintiff's father filed a habeas corpus before the High Court under section 491 The request was filed. There was no ruling in the eyes of the judicial lockup law because the terms of section 51 of were not complied with, the CPC was not complied with and the above order did not specify the period of detention of the accused. There was no legal justification for his further detention. The Act of Courts, 1964 provided a special mechanism for the decision of family matters and the CPC and the Conan Shahadat, 1984 before a family court any CPC and martyrdom law websites from Sialkot lawyer