Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 430, 425 and 34 bail, the real brother of the accused for 8 years, wanted to divert water flow and the complainant then confronted them. The accused opened fire on the complainant with his firearm, intending to kill him, but the firearm case allowed the court to grant bail before the arrest of all the accused, 12 12 1998 when the accused / applicant during the trial proceedings. Absent from court, he was found guilty / Applicant was arrested again on 22 2006 2006 The accused filed a trial / assistant session judge. This post was deleted before the arrest, which was filed on the basis of guarantees that the accused had used the wrong incentives. The bail was granted for a long period of time and also that the offense charged by the accused came under the prohibited clause of Section 497, CRPC AQ. He claimed that he was absconding because during the trial the complainant had filed three FI rupees against him in four months, two types of justification were fugitive. O'Leary, in which the fugitive dismissed the prosecution's case / evidence and another. There was no such effect but the accused had to flee due to some circumstances or to protect himself from being harassed. In the first category, fugitive bail approval had a negative effect. And in the second category, the fugitive should be considered in light of the facts and the circumstances found in it, it was alleged, in rare cases, that the fugitive may have been released on bail, for example, When the accused woman, child or child was ill and defective. F. best advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer