Find a Lawyer

SHAHID MASOOD MALIK versus HABIB BANK LTD. AND ANOTHER

R Service 37 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A & 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Department of Criminal proceedings and criminal proceedings relating to the omission of accounts from the service of the applicant to the criminal court Due to the jurisdiction forfeiture withdrawal from different accounts was withdrawn from the service before the service tribunal was also dismissed, it was raised by the applicant that he too had filed criminal charges against him. The case was acquitted of the criminal court, such a breach did not impose a sentence. Respecting the case filed against the culprits, both proceedings were prosecuted against the offender while the prosecution was in connection with the charges of infamy and corruption as the proceedings could be both as well as their nature was different. As a result, the prosecution under the efficient and disciplinary rules of a public servant, after the criminal officer was acquitted of the criminal charge, the prohibiting authority was not given the authority to serve R-37. Apply for employment at a bank in the great expense of dismissal. In the case of Habib Bank Limited employees, if the employees were found guilty, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the leave to appeal the service tribunal. property advocate from Kundina lawyer