Find a Lawyer

NIDOO ALIAS NIZAMUDDIN versus STATE

Definition of Section 5 Exploitation Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337A (ii) and 149 evidence was distinguished from the case of the accused by the complainant, in the case of the other accused, both B&C complainant and the injured witness agreed. The accused D had provoked the rest of the accused, on which two accused B&C injured Hetchy, which led to the fact. The trial court found the defendants, who were allegedly injured in the sticks suffered by the two co-accused D&E, on suspicion of being stabbed and injured by the B&C. Injuries were found on the culprits identified. Evidence from the prosecution's witnesses proved that the trial court had found the defendant guilty of the circumstances and sentenced him to the suspect A's case is suspicious, he cannot be punished if found guilty and he deserves to be acquitted of the charges. No part of the wounds suffered by the hand of the accused was established, so he too was responsible for the charges. Against the accused A&E, the trial court's reversal decision on his involvement, the accused B, C&D were set aside, being first convicted, his sentence upheld, but he was sentenced to three years. Sent to trial for term of jobs for fresh advocates from Attock lawyer