Find a Lawyer

PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL KARACHI WORKERS UNION versus MESSRS PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL KARACHI THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Section 49 (4) (e) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regular 32 (2) (c) unfair labor practice because of the employer's interim injunction order, applying for facts which The request states. Was it a collectible bargaining agent in a trade union establishment? Another union in the establishment applied for a referendum for the appointment of a collective bargaining agent in the establishment under section 20 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. Was entered At the request of the employer, the application for registration of the Third Union was registered so that the pocket union and the referendum proceedings relating to the sabotage were registered and it was stated that the petitioner already required the Petition Union with the application under Section 49 (4) of the Third Union. Not eligible for registration of persons. (E) the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, filed under the Regulation 32 (2) (c) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, for the approval of the ad hoc order, which allowed the request. And the Registrar of Trade Unions was instructed not to register the Third Trade Union with further instructions so as not to terminate members and work. The RSS and the applicants' union officials had resigned and joined the applicant union. Third Union Respondent requested that the Registrar of Trade Unions apply for registration of the Third Trade Union Vastu were to be withdrawn in defendant official, who requested the Registrar of Trade Unions has accepted the view of the application for registration of third trade union, the applicant Union to take action on your request online advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer