WAZIR KHAN versus SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, SIBI
Section 494 Explosives Related Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Application Article Article 494, CCP Withdrawing the case from the District Attorney / Special Prosecutor, the Anti-Terrorist Court filed a petition under Section 494, CCPC to withdraw the case against the applicant / accused and other accomplices, but the Anti-Terrorism Court Refused to allow the case to be withdrawn, there was no justification for it, nor was there any reason for withdrawal. Allowing for deportation is akin to revolving around the process of law and thus was not a legally valid case related to the Explosive Substances Act, all the evidence of the 1908 trial court was recorded or the government did not give any aggression. Or there was a compelling reason to withdraw from the case, and the court was bound to see whether the issue was retroactive. NGS should be used in conjunction with the trial court in a way that justice is not obstructed and that the real culprits should take advantage of Section 494, CCCC and go scot free.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Ubaro lawyer