Find a Lawyer

STATE versus AMJAD ALI

Sections 32, 33 and 36 of Police Rules 1934, Volume III, Chapter XXII, Rule 22 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Case Property re-examination of confiscated goods The Scope High Court, in the present case, ordered the drawing. There was fresh samples of parcels lying in the factory without any reason being disclosed for their inspection, except that the defendant had submitted that if the drug was re-examined then it would be found that the hashish contained The articles and articles were not collected in the annex and then pray for a re-examination of the substance that the narcotic substance has been investigated / examined. Same as the narcotic was found in some things and it was hard to hold the result of unethical conduct which resulted in guilty were protecting them. Judging by the dishonesty, the courts screening offenders and make sure that once a substance has been examined, then there should be unusual reasons before a fresh investigation of such substance. None of the reasons were disclosed by the High Court in the re-examination of intoxicants, hence the appeal was not allowed law firms from Ghuzdar lawyer