GHULAM RASOOL TAHIR versus IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI THROUGH PRESIDING OFFICER
Section 2 (i) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 46 Complaint Petitioner In order to obtain immunity from the Labor Court's jurisdiction, an employee was required to prove, by means of substantial evidence, He is a laborer who is included in the definition. Section 2 (i) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance, 1968, which has defined the ability of a person to bring an employee into the jurisdiction to decide whether an employee is a `worker. The praise comes in or? No, the declaration of an employee or the wages paid to him for this matter will have no material effect and there was no result, the legal documents / documents filed by the employers, which are clear As indicated that the applicant was an employee, inspecting the pumps and motors and making reports about the shift staff's performance, said the documents supported the applicant's request that he perform manual and academic duties. As he described them in his plea and the evidence was confirmed in his affidavit One, was that the applicant was the year 1997 and set watchmen had no record he was working as an assistant sergeant employed in the relevant time. Show that the applicant was performing the duties of the supervisor or the administrative court, in the circumstances there was an error in recording the results being done by the applicant. Reasons assigned to hold of the Labor Court wrong, unseen
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
