Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus SHAUKAT FARHAN AND 9 OTHERS

R3, 4 and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Referring to the fact of the case remanded by the Service Tribunal Failure to give the audience a chance to hear, there were meter readers in the water. And the power development authority and the agreement were working on the basis of allegations of fake meter readings, the respondents' agreements were not extended, the service tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the defendants and the case was heard by the authorities. Received remand for decision-making after providing the opportunity. Respondents' contracts regarding the accuracy of the respondents were not extended because their records contained fake meter readings The service tribunal remanded the matter to the authority at least so that it could be established on record through evidence. All allegations of counterfeit meter reading on which their contracts were not extended. Aspects of the case failed to be formally investigated only after the opportunity to hear from the rest of the residents, only to check the records according to the law on the basis of allegations of fake meter readings, it was not possible to understand that the charge was proved against them. Because the authority itself imposed a contract extension or any other conditions. Respondents, accordingly, were also obliged to prove that the service tribunal's case was justified in remanding the authority that further appeal was denied. \ R \ n immigration advocates email from Sukkur lawyer