The testimony of section 302 (b) was the testimony of both the accused and the deceased real brother, while one of the prosecution's witnesses was his mother, statements of the prosecution witnesses in connection with the release of the armed suspect from Kalashnikov, the suspect in his confession guilt. In a statement that could not be made, it was requested that because of a property dispute between himself and his deceased brother, the victim threatened that he would not survive him, after which he picked up Kalashnikov and went to the village. Intended for aerial shootings to attract people who would settle down. Among them; Kalashnikov was accidentally said to have gone off and the suspect's bullet did not explain the circumstances in which the accused's confession went, and in which case Kalashnikov was accidentally shot and fired. The deceased accused, who, at his request, had no intention of murder. His brother was expected to try to save his life, but he left his brother at the scene and went to his house not found according to his plea of the accused. It was reflected immediately after the incident. His intentions, which negated his request for the accidental shooting of Kalashnikov's murder, have not been stated in the gunfire, nor have the circumstances indicated that the defendant's life is in immediate danger. That he had justified his shooting with Kalashnikov's mother. The accused and his other son / accused were also included in the other accused for intentional murder and his plea could not be accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
