Find a Lawyer

SYED ASHFAQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI

Section 4 NED University of Engineering and Technology Act (III of 1977), Sections 28 (iv), 38 and 46 (1) (a) of the Constitution of NEU University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Employee Eligibility and Discipline , 1990 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 188 and 212 (3) Revision on Supreme Court decision and compulsory retirement retirement scope departmental appeal not excluded under any limitation Service appeal dismissed by service tribunal The law of the appropriate and relevant case is not stated. An attempt was made to review the decision that as an applicant being an employee of the University, the petition was submitted to the Vice-Chancellor on 16th August, 2002 for the implementation of Retirement to Retirement, which was accepted. Retired on completion of 13 years 2003 qualifying service. The Department appealed the order to withdraw his retirement order on March 31, 2003, but his appeal was rejected, stating that he exercised this option for retirement upon completion of his 25-year qualifying service. But the rigorous service tribunal allowed the appeal and it was barred before the tribunal was authorized, even though the departmental appeal was timely barred. He also said that the use of the applicant's powers to retire was not voluntary, but under a rigorous appeal filed by the university, the Supreme Court petition filed a revision petition against the Supreme Court decision, Wherein it was claimed that the Supreme Court had erred in law. Saying that the service tribunal upped that ground online advocate from Padidan lawyer