Find a Lawyer

NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The reduction in sentencing, mitigating circumstances was related to the prosecution's testimony, although their statements could not be dismissed on the basis of the mere fact that the presence of the single accused and the daylight. And both had prosecution. The witnesses did not have any prior hostility or illicit desire from the accused, so that they could be included in the false case, both witnesses gave a permanent account of the incident and confirmed each other on almost all material points of the case. The report was immediately reported to the police within an hour. Contradictions in the prosecution's evidence did not result because naturally it was concluded that after more than 5/2 years of delays when the evidence was recorded, the medical evidence was fully supported by the medical evidence which Was also confirmed by the fact. The felony prosecution's prosecution successfully proved the account against the accused successfully backed by medical evidence, and the felony charges of prosecuting the accused were confirmed, but the accused's There were some mitigating circumstances in the case. The first accused was less than 20 years from the date of 20. Secondly, there was no illicit desire or enmity between the accused and the accused, who were the same age before the incident. Third, the purpose stated in the FIR was merely trivial in nature and was not supported by any independent evidence. And, fourthly, under section 2b2 (b), the PPC, after being punished with the knife on the victim, while maintaining the conviction of the crime, the accused property advocates from Kundina lawyer