Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSAIN SOOMRO versus THE STATE

Section 5 365A / Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (2) (E) and 7 (E) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the minor contradictions and deviations in the FIR Delay in Evidence The prosecution's evidence against the accused / applicant was that he had kidnapped the complainant's son along with a fellow accused. The chains and clothing used at the time of imprisonment were recovered from the possession of the accused and the accused in the trial court, while the accused and a co-accused sentenced the accused / applicant to life imprisonment and made her real and immovable property. The appeal filed against the forfeiture sentence was dismissed by the High Court alleging that the FIR was deserted by 36 hours and that it was due to his business relationship with the abducted father. Was wrongly involved but the delay in filing an FIR was not always fatal for prosecution cases, however In some cases they may be generated by the insurgency. In cases involving abduction of youth in cases of corruption, police, along with parents, also tried their best to find the victim instead of immediately lodging an FIR for fear of the victim's death. Are. In soliciting the FIR, solicitation of ransom cases was to be dealt with handily if there were small discrepancies and deviations in the evidence or error from the investigating agency, and the courts could reach the facts of the case and Always work in a dynamic and practical way in drawing accurate and rational arguments and conclusions arising from facts and situations. Every m immigration advocates from Mari Indus lawyer