Find a Lawyer

ALTAF AHMAD versus KHALID UMAR

A. XXXVII, the suit for recovery of the money on the basis of the promise vacancy was dismissed by the trial court on the basis that the admission stamp on the pro note was not canceled / the trial court observed that the post on the pro note The ticket was not canceled, was correct because such a promising note on which the plaintiff's case was based, was itself inadmissible in the evidence, the trial court's decision under the plaintiff by the plaintiff was justified. Was excluded, the appeal could not be interrupted. list of supreme court advocates from Tando Jam lawyer