Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 302, 337A (ii) (ii), 337 F (i) (iii) / 34 The value of the evidence was the punishment of the Senate, the complaining party and the accused neighbor and any unlawful desire or enmity between the parties before the events. Didn't exist. The defendant, who was proven by medical evidence, suppressed by prosecution witnesses, delayed filing an FIR that was not specified, which would adversely affect the prosecution's case, as would the prosecution's witnesses. Stated and accordingly the role of the defendants was exaggerated, the facts of the case attracted the provisions of Ex 300 exceptions provisions, PPC sentenced the accused to Section 2302 (b), Section 2302 (c), under the PPC, was replaced by a crime under the PPC, in which circumstances one of the accused was in jail after his arrest when he was arrested. He was jailed for more than eight years, during the appeal, the co-accused's bail order revealed that he was 85 years old and was in poor health and with weak eyes, suspended his eyesight and his sentence. She went on to serve two years, 5 months and 25 days in jail after the two accused had already been reduced to prison time and thus the execution of justice could be met. Under Sections 337A (i) (ii) and 337F (i) (iii), the PPC was kept separate. law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer