Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, OKARA

The accused accused of defining sections 324 and 337f (v) evidence was specifically named in the FIR because the sole perpetrator of the alleged crime is said to have been found below the right knee of the prosecution's witness. The firearm was injured, which says that the injured person appeared at the trial and the court pointed his finger at the suspect. The injured person was tried in front of the court by the eyewitness and the defendant after the fireworks were recovered and, following medical evidence, both the courts agreed, after reviewing and examining the evidence available on record. Their conclusion is that the prosecution has, without reasonable doubt, succeeded in establishing the crime of the accused. No special or specific misrepresentation or non-recourse of evidence was indicated by the courts below, the weakness of any jurisdiction, the illegality of the procedure, or the error of reasoning, the part of the courts below The accused was identified by the lawyer so as to grant bail in the case - the trial court did not find excessive or coercive cases in the cases sanctioned against the accused by the High Court in its exercise of jurisdiction. , Could not interfere with the High Court's jurisdiction under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer