Find a Lawyer

FAZAL NABI versus STATE

Sections 9 (b) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), conviction of testimony of section 103 evidence, reduction of violation of section 103, CR PCF police witnesses charged against first offender and ex-offender The charge was 5 kilograms of marijuana confiscated from his possession, the trial court recovered the narcotics in accordance with the supply of Rule 25 under the Drug Identification Act 1997 and in particular the expulsion of section 103. It was targeted under the provision of specialized broadcasting applications. , The CC defendant failed to present impressive evidence of confidence in his defense that could erode and diminish the effect of the prosecution's evidence on record, the policemen were qualified witnesses and their testimony could not be simply dismissed. That they are evidence of recovery in police personnel. Respect for the quantity of the drug was recovered and shipped to me was established permanently by the prosecutor's vit nesses for chemical analysis The chemical analyst report on the recovered substance was positive the suspect was the first offender , And the previous non-criminal, his life sentence was reduced to seven years. jobs for fresh advocates from Ambela lawyer