Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABBAS versus STATE

Sections 302 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the testimony of Section 6, the benefit of the doubt when it was dark at dawn prayer, and witnesses claimed that they saw the incident in the light of the flames. Had seen At that time, the witnesses knew only one accused, while the rest of the accused did not know about them. The prosecutor's case was that the witnesses had witnessed the incident more than a foot away and in light of the identity of the accused, about whom I didn't know. The witnesses were extremely skeptical at such a distance, a prosecutor's witness who claimed to have identified the accused during the identification parade, while presenting before the trial court, exclusively stated that he did not identify any of the suspects. The said statement is sufficient to doubt the credibility of the witness, no evidence of testimony was available against the other accused, except the evidence of the fugitive, and these pieces of separate evidence, confirming their conviction and conviction. In the case of the accused and one of his co-accused, he was entitled to take advantage of the same offender and conviction. That the two accused were set aside by the trial court and they were acquitted of the charge, and they were released. jobs for fresh advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer