In making the Claims for Contempt Clause & Su 13, in his examination, the Chief did not specify the exact date of sale of the batch in the examination, nor did he make any conclusions, but it was allegedly stated that it took about nine months. Was told before. The plaintiff was not proved either by the plaintiff or by the witnesses through whom the plaintiff had obtained information about the sale in the sale, not examining the plaintiff's contention of the facts listed by the two courts below against the plaintiff. Was made, when the result of not reading any misrepresentation and evidence was shown, the second appeal could not be interfered with by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
