PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Arts 142, 144 and Section 28, the application for such a request was rejected by the courts on the wrong assumption that the right to property due to limitation under the law in accordance with SCMR 2063 of the Supreme Court 1993 Was charged with termination. The effect stated that the decision was clearly implemented since 31 ruling 1991, which could not affect the defendant's facts from where he returned in 1962, on the record to prove a negative possession request. No documentary evidence was available, which required close scrutiny, since an elementary school for children was being admittedly run on the land, it was in the public interest to remand the case for judgment according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Noor kot lawyer
