Find a Lawyer

SH. SHAFIQUE-UR-REHMAN versus CHAIRMAN SIALKOT DRYPORT

Articles 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O 15 Application for Complaint for Deportation on Charges of Corruption Employees Recruitment Appellate / Employees charged with Corruption After the previous inquiry was dismissed against them, after the charge sheet was laid, the statements of the witnesses submitted by the respondents / authorities during the inquiry were not signed by the inquiry officer, saying that these statements had no significance. And was responsible for keeping the inquiry separate on this matter. was not. The law requires that the person being questioned should be allowed to participate in the inquiry and be allowed to examine witnesses and present their defense, but in the present case, this was not done. An inquiry was made against the appellants. Defective, dismissal order passed against the appellants; in such cases, the employees were obliged to set aside. Usually, the employer was restored to the job, allowing the fresh investigation, but the present case. I appellants had threatened serious consequences to their officers (managers, etc.) and threatened to destroy and destroy them, to threaten the establishment, and to persuade their colleagues. Strike and illegal assembly in front of the main gate. If the appellant is reinstated to the job, either of them or their workers or any other worker at their disposal may have a law and order situation or may have difficulty working smoothly. jobs for advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer