Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT, SUB-INSPECTOR M/7 versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 7 OTHERS

R13 1 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Fitness complaint of public servant was that he was not verified because the inspector was employed as a public servant. Was not awarded because he was awarded seven censorship convictions and was fined Rs. 4000. The department authority suspended the employment of a civil servant for six years, six years in 1996 and for one month a year, a civil servant. Its integrity was also found to be controversial. The Annual Secret Report, 1986 Service Tribunal, also found that government employees were not fit for development and the appeal was dismissed. In accordance with R 13 1 of the Government Code 1934, a public servant as an inspector was not found fit and suitable and fit. No interference was sought by the Supreme Court in the search of fact recorded by the Departmental Authority and the Service Tribunal. inheritance advocates near Chowk Maitla lawyer