HAJI MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MEMON, ADVOCATE COMPLAINANT: IN THE MATTER OF versus HAJI MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MEMON, ADVOCATE COMPLAINANT: IN THE MATTER OF
Pension benefits, the death of an old retired government employee and his wife were brought directly to the Supreme Court notice in petitioner's argument that the death was due to starvation because the slain official The employee could not receive his pension benefits. The effect was such a pity that the government employees, after having served for a long time, sweated their blood and died in a bad state due to non-payment of pension / pension benefits. The responsibility can be set. On those who were directly responsible but at the same time it was a gross problem of almost every department, where public workers failed to perform their proper role in accordance with the law. The result is that good governance is badly disturbed. Was. The pension / gratuity and GP fund had to be fined somehow to delay the recovery of such retired officers / officials or widows or orphan children. Such cheap action by responsible officials violated Arts 9 and 14 of the Constitution and it was against the dignity of the human being that the old couple had to die in a bad state and for almost three years when pensions by the respective constituencies. No action was taken to finalize the case, when the matter first came to the Supreme Court, the concerned officials began moving in different directions to show their performance and to clarify their stand before the Supreme Court. Highly condemnable and in no way encouraging to them. Supreme Court directs all government departments, agencies and officers
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
