Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE

A re-examination of the section 302 (b) evidence shows that the reconstruction of the medical and academic account police file, FIR, shows that five people were killed in which the accused was killed, two of the defendants being compromised by legal heirs. The trial court acquitted the accused. The deceased, while one was convicted and the other two sentenced to life imprisonment, in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal, the plea of the accused was accepted and acquitted but the accused was acquitted. The conviction and sentence was upheld, which led to the accused appearing in court. The witnesses statement of the incident contradicted the medical evidence, the accused further pleaded that the recovery memo and the site plan were forged because they were later prepared after destroying the police file, as well as testimony from the prosecution's witnesses. Apparently, it could not be said that the fire that was fired by the accused did not land on the victim's right shoulder, which was confirmed by him as medical evidence was not in dispute and the eyewitness testimony of the prosecution witnesses Were not disputed, therefore, to no avail was the site planning question and account inquiry later Recovery notice by the officer regarding the eviction of the crime had no effect on the deletion of the police file and the prosecution's case / evidence on the judicial section of the file which led to the prosecution's finding that such documents The accused was not sentenced and sentenced for missing / destroyed. In view of the evidence of the witnesses, the motive part of the prosecution's story, along with the medical evidence, was the trial court's seven top civil advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer