Find a Lawyer

JAMEEL AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the evidence was presented to the ocular account by two sons of the deceased and no independent witness was presented during the trial. The post-mortem report states that the deceased had received twelve due to sharp weapons. Injuries occurred while reading a minute of the post-mortem report revealed the fact that the casualties were close to thirty-six. The conduct of the prosecution witnesses who did not turn in to protect their father from the attacker who had only a knife in his hand could not be enough to stop the victim's sons, and there was no arrest. The attacker was really unnatural. The circumstances of the incident showed that both said witnesses arrived at the scene after their father's death, that the accused was the nephew of the victim and that there was any hostility or illegality between the victim and the accused. Desire didn't have a background. About 3 hours after being sent to Martu to justify the effectiveness of 36 wounds on the dead body, Erie was dropped for post-mortem examination, which would mean that the investigating officer spent considerable time on the spot and complained. The statement of the recipient was recorded after the investigation because the FI money not listed at the police station was surrounded, and it was the result of ideas that could not be relied upon. Blood stains were placed on the theft because none of the people were involved in the recovery process and recovery was effected from a location in which everyone had access. And that no one, but with no power, because of the murder of the accused, because the prosecutor had to stand on his own legs and the accused was convicted of weakness in his defense. famous supreme court advocate from Dinga lawyer