Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD KALEEM KHAN

R13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Articles 3, 5, 29 and Articles 164 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 42 appeals to the former party decree from the Supreme Court, limiting the ex parte decree The application was granted against the appellant and the petitioner was asked to set aside that the former party decree was simultaneously rejected by the trial court and the Shariah court, the appellant appealed to the former party decree to remain separate. An appeal was filed in the Supreme Court against the expulsion order. About two years after the passage of the former parliament order, the appellant, while the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Procedure Rules 1998, which was a special law, had 30 days to move the petition to keep the former party order separate. Limit was provided. Section 29 of the Schedule of Limitation Act, 1908, as applicable in section 13 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Procedure Rules 1998, applies to section 29 and applies to the above section. In the case of the court, the court had no jurisdiction to waive the limit under section 5 of the Act, 1908. The dismissal petition is expected to be rejected as there is no jurisdiction to revoke the earlier order, Shariah Court appeals against the trial court's decision. Was deleted as list of advocates from Barbar Loi lawyer